Ijraset Journal For Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology
Authors: Priyanka Vishwakarma, Dr. Anil Suman
DOI Link: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.59478
Certificate: View Certificate
Concrete is well-known for being the most frequently utilized construction material due to its affordability, longevity, and adaptability. However, traditional concrete production requires a large amount of cement and aggregate, raising concerns about its environmental impact and depletion of natural resources. In order to address these issues and promote sustainability, we have been exploring alternative materials like Recron3s polyester fiber and steel slag. Recron3s fiber can enhance the flexibility of concrete, making it a valuable addition. On the other hand, the steel industry generates a byproduct known as steel slag, which presents environmental challenges and disposal issues. Nonetheless, when incorporated into concrete, steel slag can improve the mechanical and physical properties of the material, increasing its durability. Our research focuses on replacing OPC 53 grade cement and natural aggregate with Recron3s fiber and steel slag aggregate, respectively. Different percentages of steel slag aggregate (0%, 20%, 25%, 30%) and Recron3s fiber (0%, 1.25%) were used as substitutes for traditional materials in M30 grade concrete with a water-cement ratio of 0.44. We created concrete mixes by partially replacing OPC 53 with Recron3s fiber and substituting natural aggregate with steel slag aggregate to evaluate the performance of eco-friendly concrete. We then evaluated the performance of these mixes through workability tests such as slump cone, vee-bee consistometer, and compaction factor test. Overall, incorporating Recron3s fiber and steel slag aggregate into concrete has yielded positive results in enhancing mechanical properties and reducing environmental impact.
I. INTRODUCTION
Concrete plays a crucial role in civil engineering research as a fundamental building material. Efforts have been made to improve its strength, quality, and durability in order to achieve greater cost efficiency in construction. With the increasing demand for environmentally friendly and high-performance construction materials, researchers and engineers are exploring new additives and alternative aggregates to enhance the quality of concrete. The construction industry has recently shifted towards sustainable practices, leading to interest in using recycled materials and synthetic fibers to reduce environmental impact and improve the performance of concrete structures. Recron3S polyester fibers, known for their strong tensile strength and durability, provide a promising option for reinforcing concrete to enhance its mechanical properties and crack resistance. Similarly, steel slag, a byproduct of the steel manufacturing process, has gained attention as a potential alternative to traditional aggregates due to its favorable engineering properties and its ability to address environmental concerns related to disposal. However, despite its versatility and widespread use, it is crucial to acknowledge that concrete does have its limitations, particularly in terms of slump height. These limitations can result in subpar performance and potential issues such as segregation and bleeding, which can in turn make the concrete more prone to spreading fractures. This is especially true in the context of rigid pavements, where low workable concrete is essential for achieving the desired outcomes. It is therefore important to carefully consider these factors when working with concrete to ensure optimal results. Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) has been proposed as a solution to tackle obstacles in concrete construction by adding fibers to enhance resistance to segregation and improve overall characteristics. This approach has shown promising results in enhancing workability and concrete performance. The primary objective of this research paper is to greatly improve the workability of fresh concrete. In this investigation, polyester fibers were added to.0%,and 1.25% of the cement content, while steel slag aggregate was employed at 0%, 20%, 25% and 30%, Instead of using coarse aggregates, a detailed comparison analysis was carried out to determine the significant percentage change in workability when fibers and steel slag aggregate are added. The research paper provides a succinct yet persuasive comparison between Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) pavements and conventional concrete pavements.
The following test considered for finding concrete workability
II. LITERATURE REVIEW
Pan et al. [2] examined the strength of hardened self-compacting concrete and the workability of new mixtures with varying steel slag sand replacement rates. Steel slag self-compacting concrete with optimal workability can be achieved by varying the water–binder ratio, paste–aggregate ratio, fine–coarse aggregate ratio, and the quantity of superplasticizer. This can help achieve the workability design target. Additionally, steel slag sand improves the hardened concrete's interfacial transition zone, which increases the concrete's strength. We may infer that this is one of the best methods for preparing self-compacting concrete using steel slag sand as fine aggregate. Subathra Devi and Gnanavel [3]studied that The ideal replacement ratio for coarse aggregate is 30% and for fine aggregate is 40%; any higher replacement percentage will result in a reduction in compressive strength. Concrete becomes less workable as the replacement percentage rises. When compared to coarse aggregate replacement, fine aggregate replacement exhibits superior workability. Awoyera et al. [4] obtained from the slump test. For both the concrete made with SSA and NA, it was observed that the slump increases with increasing aggregate sizes. This could be as a result of constant water-cement ratio used in the mixing of the concrete. It was an indication that large size of aggregates increases fluidity or consistency due to low aggregate-cement ratio. More so, the increment in the size of aggregate increases; fluidity, consistency and workability due to the reduction in surface area. A few things need to be taken into account for steel slag to be successfully included as aggregates in construction products. First, can steel slag be used for construction. It was an industrial byproduct that was dumped in landfills until recently. The material's technical attributes are then looked at because steel slag has certain physicochemical properties that make it demand special handling, but when used for the right purposes, it can also yield maximum value. Using a by-product can increase the added value of a product when it is used in certain applications, primarily where it is more cost-effective than using standard resources[5].
In Jordan, there are three significant steel factories. Steel slag, its sole byproduct, is haphazardly disposed of in open spaces, posing numerous environmental hazards. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adding steel slag aggregate (SSA) to locally produced asphalt concrete (AC) mixes may enhance their engineering qualities. Assessing the steel slag's toxicity as well as its chemical and physical characteristics was the first step in the investigation. Next, SSA was used to replace 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of the limestone coarse aggregate in the AC mixes. The enhancement of the AC samples' indirect tensile strength, resilient modulus, rutting resistance, fatigue life, creep modulus, and stripping resistance served as a gauge for the efficacy of the SSA. The mechanical characteristics of the AC mixes were shown to be enhanced when up to 75% of the limestone coarse aggregate was substituted with SSA[6]. Slag's potential as a useful addition to concrete mixtures, exhibiting its favorable effects on stiffness, toughness, energy absorption capacity, and static and dynamic compressive strength. Finding the ideal steel slag composition is essential, highlighting the need for careful thought to be put into the design of concrete mixes. Furthermore, the benefits to the environment associated with the usage of steel slag suggest a viable path forward for the adoption of sustainable building techniques.
III. MATERIALS AND METHODS
A. List of Materials
B. Sample Preparation:
???????C. Mix Design for M30 grade of concrete
This entails the determination of the minimum strength that must be attained by the concrete mix. To design an M30-grade concrete mix, we meticulously consulted as per the IRC: 44-2017 [9].
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A. Experiment Results
In this study, we have used 1.25% recron3s fiber as a partial replacement for cement, while also substituting 20 mm coarse aggregate with steel slag. Several tests were conducted to evaluate the overall performance of the concrete. The results and discussions for fresh concrete are outlined below.
B. Results Discussion
The workability of the concrete decreases as the percentage of steel slag in the mixture increases. This is because steel slag is a byproduct of steel production and its presence can affect the overall properties of the concrete, including its workability. As more steel slag is added to the mix, the concrete may become less fluid and harder to work with, making it more challenging to place and finish. It is important to carefully consider the amount of steel slag used in the concrete mix to ensure that the desired workability is maintained.
Based on the experimental investigations, it can be inferred that as the percentage of slag aggregate is increased, the workability of plain cement concrete with polyester fibers and slag aggregate in place of cement and coarse aggregates is reduced. Declaration Statement Conflicts of interest: The author states that there are no conflicts of interest in the publication of this paper.
[1] C. and C. Sectional Committee, “IS (Indian Standard) 1199?: 1959-Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete,” Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1199?: 1959, 1959. [2] S. Pan, D. Chen, X. Chen, G. Ge, D. Su, and C. Liu, “Experimental Study on the Workability and Stability of Steel Slag Self-Compacting Concrete,” Applied Sciences 2020, Vol. 10, Page 1291, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1291, Feb. 2020. [3] V. Subathra Devi and B. K. Gnanavel, “Properties of Concrete Manufactured Using Steel Slag,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 97, pp. 95–104, Jan. 2014. [4] P. O. Awoyera, A. W. Adekeye, and O. E. Babalola, “Influence of Electric Arc Furnace (EAF)Slag Aggregate Sizes on the Workabilityand Durability of Concrete,” Civil Engineering Journal (Iran), vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 1716–1730, Oct. 2021. [5] D. M. Proctor, E. C. Shay, K. A. Fehling, and B. L. Finley, “Assessment of Human Health and Ecological Risks Posed by the Uses of Steel-Industry Slags in the Environment,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 681–711, Oct. 2002. [6] I. M. Asi, H. Y. Qasrawi, and F. I. Shalabi, “Use of steel slag aggregate in asphalt concrete mixes,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 902–911, Aug. 2007. [7] C. and C. Sectional Committee, “IS (Indian Standard) 2386 (Part 1)?: 1963- Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete - Part I?: Particle Size and Shape,” Bureau of Indian Standards, India, 1963. [8] C. and C. Sectional Committee, “IS (Indian Standard) 383?: 2016-Coarse and Fine Aggregate for Concrete - Specification (Third Revision),” Bureau of Indian Standards, India, 2016. [9] Indian Roads Congress, “IRC (Indian Roads Congress):44-Guidelines for Cement Concrete Mix Design for Pavements (First Revision),” 2017.
Copyright © 2024 Priyanka Vishwakarma, Dr. Anil Suman. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Paper Id : IJRASET59478
Publish Date : 2024-03-27
ISSN : 2321-9653
Publisher Name : IJRASET
DOI Link : Click Here